5 Oct
2005
5 Oct
'05
6:52 p.m.
On 10/05/2005 01:34 PM, Jose wrote: [snip]
Serialize tables is nice and many memory-based apps can benefit but for most databases persistence is a must.
I agree with previous statement that persistence is the top priority. RML has tackled this with a separate persist library that provides the persistent STL containers.
Why can't the existing boost serialize library be used instead of a separate persist library?