Hi Antony,
2013/12/7 Antony Polukhin
2013/12/7 TONGARI J
Hi there,
You can see the idea here: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/3e920faa604fa534
Is there any technical reason not having boost::get work like that?
I like the idea of polymorthic_get<>. Created a ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/9479
But I'm not sure that boost::get<> by default must work in that way.
Not a must, but intuitive to do so for me. Won't there be ambiguity with `operator Base()`? And what if the user
stores Base and Derived in boost::variant and want to chek that Base is stored in variant, not Derived?
Maybe we can promote this idea to something more general, like 'variant_cast', not necessary have to be in base-derived relationship but just something convertible. Does that make sense? Thanks,