John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
Looks like a bug in the MS implementation to me, the test case appears to be something like:
typedef int (&func_ref)(float, double); typedef result_of<function_ref(float,double)>::type result_type; // error here.
Thanks. Following on with the type_traits failures with is_polymorphic (http://tinyurl.com/6jq57y): If you have: class foo { public: virtual ~foo() { } }; class bar : virtual public foo { public: virtual ~bar() { } }; Then boost::is_polymorphic<bar> is true, but mstr1::is_polymorphic<bar> is false. If i either: -make foos destructor non-virtual -add an additional virtual method to bar -change the defintion of bar to 'class bar : public foo' then mstr1::is_polymorphic<bar> becomes true. MS Bug? Thanks, Richard Webb