23 Nov
2009
23 Nov
'09
3:38 p.m.
Ian Emmons wrote:
It is probably easier to emulate snprintf using Boost.Format. I'm not sure what requirements you have that cause you to want to continue using snprintf, but you may find that you can simply switch from snprintf to Boost.Format (with no emulation).
I believe there is confusion. As far as I'm concerned, I do not have any such requirements. It is that I was told (see comments here [1]) that Boost.Test will continue using snprintf, so I'm looking for workaround that would be acceptable for Boost.Test. Boost.Format works for me. Does it work for Boost.Test? [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3558 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net