6 Jun
2007
6 Jun
'07
12:40 p.m.
on Mon Jun 04 2007, "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental-AT-thomson.com> wrote:
I understand that this mindset may be unusual. Still, I find the idea that the trunk is assumed to be unstable a bit odd. The trunk should be stable and everyone should work to keep it that way.
If trunk is stable, how do I test my development?
If trunk is not stable, what motivation do you have for testing your code?
I don't care about trunk in general at all. I don't believe we need a notion of boost trunk whatsoever.
I've been asking myself why we're still talking about a "trunk," too. Can somebody explain why, and what it's supposed to mean? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com