18 Jan
2011
18 Jan
'11
12:55 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto@cs.aau.dk> wrote:
I'm fine with BOOST_ASSERT_MSG().
+1 for BOOST_ASSERT_MSG().
Since we are adding assert.hpp I would like to see
BOOST_ASSERT_IF() BOOST_ASSERT_IF_MSG()
as well. It is really much clearer to read and maintain than
BOOST_ASSERT( !foo() || condition );
+1 -- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris