I am very interested, and I have spent some thought on how to create some of these submissions myself. Coming from an Astrophysics research group, I am quite pleased with the boost standards for code and documentation and I feel that the boost license is a good basis for research software writing since it is always possible that a research application could become the basis for a commercial application, but you also want direct access to the source code and the ability to modify. John Phillips Tom Brinkman wrote:
What is the current status of all Boost mathmatical, statistical and econometric libraries currently in development?
The collection of boost math libraries that are currently included in the library are world-class and provide a wonderful foundation to build-upon.
However, many areas of advanced statistical and mathmatical inference are not currently being addressed by any of the boost libraries.
Is there currently a way for those boost developers with a background in mathmatics to coordinate their efforts. If not, why not? Lets get such a discussion started.
A continued and regular dialog of mathmatics as it relates to boost library development would be of great use, primaryily to avoid overaping our efforts.
If your a mathmetician and agree with me that boost is a great foundation to build-upon, let the group/me know.
[snip]
Regards, Tom Brinkman
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost