31 Aug
2010
31 Aug
'10
10:14 p.m.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:47:53 +0200, Ilya Sokolov <ilyasokol@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30.08.2010 22:59, Boris Schaeling wrote:
I checked now why I even had to add -lpthread if it wasn't required in earlier Boost.Process drafts: The new status class uses a worker thread to support asynchronous I/O. So yes, threading=multi is the natural choice. ;) Updated in SVN and in the ZIP file.
I expect bp::status::async_wait() to be used rarely enough, to some degree where BOOST_PROCESS_NO_THREAD is justified.
I have no strong opinion. I wouldn't care but if it helps others I can add it? Boris