On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
AMDG
On 03/18/2011 02:44 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
Awesome, Steven; it's great to see this library progressing. Where does it stand in terms of compatibility with TR1/C++0x? I know that for a while they had drifted quite widely out-of-sync.
I've tried to match the C++0x draft. To my knowledge the only remaining incompatibilities are: * I'm playing fast and loose with the integral types used. e.g. uint_least32_t instead of uint_fast32_t, or uintmax_t, instead of unsigned long long.
Why? (just curious)
* There is no typedef /unspecified/ default_random_engine.
Why not? (ditto)
* A few constructors that take rvalue references are missing. rvalues will bind to const T& instead.
OK -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com