3 May
2005
3 May
'05
7:22 a.m.
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Try to compile with all compilers we support. In some cases It just fails somewhere within Boost.Range headers. Also why would I need to include all there headers if I am not really need them.
I did a quick release build test using bcc32 5.6.4 and iterating over a list<int> using a simple for loop and BOOST_FOREACH showed that BOOST_FOREACH generates nearly twice as many instructions as using the hand-written for loop. Borland's optimiser isn't great, so I guess that is part of the problem. Cheers Russell