28 May
2011
28 May
'11
8:31 p.m.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. < jeffrey.hellrung@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's a trial attempt at an implementation of the macro (warning: not tested):
I haven't looked at the implementation in depth, but if I recall correctly, C++0x explicit conversions to bool are not quite the same as a safe-bool conversion (explicit conversions still generally require explicit casts, correct me if I'm wrong). Because of this, I do not believe it would be a good idea for such a macro to automatically use explicit conversion operators when available as it could result in user code that compiles in 03 but fails to compile in 0x. -- -Matt Calabrese