On 2/2/05 5:24 PM, "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Daryle Walker <darylew@hotmail.com> writes:
On 1/31/05 4:29 PM, "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
"John H. Spicer" <jhs@edg.com> writes:
This file includes the code below in an #else for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION. We give an error on that code because of a missing "template" keyword (between :: and helper).
What is the proper channel for reporting things like this?
http://www.boost.org/more/bugs.htm shows several alternatives.
template < unsigned long Value2 > struct helper { BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT( unsigned long, value = static_gcd_helper2_t<Value2>::helper<Value1 % Value2>::value ); };
Did you apply the change already, Dave? (Assuming that it's the correct action.)
Sorry, not my job (and it would be nice if you'd check the CVS yourself to find out, if you are the maintainer). All I did was to forward the message here.
I would think that section 3.1 on that web page could apply. Anyway, I placed a change similar to ones already in that header file. template < unsigned long Value2 > struct helper { BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT( unsigned long, value = static_gcd_helper2_t<Value2>::BOOST_NESTED_TEMPLATE helper<Value1 % Value2>::value ); }; It's not tested, though. (Do we still have compilers that have BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION #defined?) -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com