27 Jun
2005
27 Jun
'05
6:45 p.m.
"AlisdairM" <alisdair.meredith@uk.renaultf1.com> escribió en el mensaje news:d9pfcd$pc8$1@sea.gmane.org...
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
[SNIPPED] Isn't 0x564 the version macro number for this compiler?
Any ideas?
That is the correct version number, but shouldn't the test be
BOOST_WORKAROUND( __BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT( 0x564) )
IIUC that produces the workaround to be activated even for earlier versions of the Borland compiler, but 5.5.1 in particular handles the code very well (in fact, I developed the library in that compiler). Best Fernando Cacciola SciSoft