
Would this not break all code currently using the templated allocator version of boost::function? I would call that not at all appropriate for a dot release, and should be avoided outright if possible. On 11/1/07, Eric Niebler <eric@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
Any chance of incorporating
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2308.html
into boost::function for the 1.35.1 release? Here is a link to my implementation, including a SVN patch file:
http://www.revergestudios.com/boost-function/
I've tested with MSVC 8 and 9, and with gcc 3.4.4.
Funny, we haven't even released 1.35 yet, and you're already assuming we'll need a point release. ;-) It's too late to add new features for 1.35, and a point release is for bug fixes only, so I'd imagine the earliest somthing like this can go in would be 1.36.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost