29 Nov
2004
29 Nov
'04
10:23 p.m.
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 10:40 AM 11/29/2004, Daniel Frey wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
[snip]
Inspired by that, how about simply writing
std::Boost
I don't like tying Boost too closely to the standardization effort. While a lot of Boost libraries are candidates for standardization, that isn't the whole story of Boost. I'd rather see the tie to "C++".
I'd say that Boost libraries aim for "standardization quality", not exactly for standardization. C++ is IMHO too vague, YMMV. Regards, Daniel