Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Currently, the name mangling scheme used on this platform is the default one selected by the compiler. It turns out that this is a bad choice when compiling boost. ... Therefore I propose to explicitely set the name mangling to ansi in the tools file for this compiler. Does anyone have any strong feelings or arguments against such a change?
Wouldn't this force users to compile all of their code with nondefault name mangling? I would prefer that the docs include some warnings about the problem, with instructions about how to alter the name mangling. Making nondefault compiler behavior the default for using boost places a burden on the users rather than making it easier for them. Instead, just make sure it's easy for users that are already using the alternate name mangling to configure boost for it. -- Dick Hadsell 914-259-6320 Fax: 914-259-6499 Reply-to: hadsell@blueskystudios.com Blue Sky Studios http://www.blueskystudios.com 44 South Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601