Here is my experience with the 1.32 branch: 1. 1.32 went gold - I download the tagged version and built it with the "install" option. This resulted in an include folder of "C:\Boost\include\boost-1_32" with corresponding lib files. 2. For the next couple of months I get the HEAD - when I build it, it also goes into "C:\Boost\include\boost-1_32" with corresponding lib names. Now I am capable of maintain separate folders, but it is very easy to get fooled about which version I am actually using. Now after the 1_33 release, if you instantly upped it to 1_33_1 (even if it never went gold) I would know that the largest version is always the HEAD. Thoughts? Gordon. "Doug Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> wrote in message news:ffdad8eaad25f971a5fc8a2694ee1598@cs.indiana.edu...
On May 9, 2005, at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
As soon a 1.33 is released can we up the version number to 1_33_1 or such like in CVS, as this will make switching between HEAD and gold a lot easier?
I'm not sure I understand quite what you mean. We will have a Version_1_33_0 tag in CVS once we release 1.33, which you can use to get to 1.33.
Doug
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost