20 Mar
2012
20 Mar
'12
3:46 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey@gmail.com> wrote:
A side note not directly related to your issue: Consider using Boost.Phoenix instead of Boost.Lambda (Boost.Lambda is "obsolete" and it was replaced by the more powerful Boost.Phoenix).
Ok. Is it available in version 1.48? Why was boost.lambda deprecated in favor of this new library?
For this code I'd just use a plain old for loop. -- Olaf