On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Yakov Galka <ybungalobill@gmail.com> wrote:
2) Yes, it treats string literals as arrays, so what? It's exactly what we want.
No, because it'll include the null terminator.
If you're talking about including or not the null terminator, then I'm still not sure on this point. We can say that our strings don't contain zeros in the middle (which is acceptable for function expecting const char*), then if
It'd be nice to support 'binary' strings too.
end() points to a null terminator we can use it as an optimization when
end() will point one past the terminator.
3) No, iterator_range just stores a pair of iterators, no memory allocations are done. Also see 1), it's irrelevant to the discussion.
Ah, I think I'm confused with another type then. Olaf