[boost] Re: Perfect Forwarding (almost)

Brian McNamara <lorgon@cc.gatech.edu> writes:

It is unclear to me if/how your code solves the "perfect forwarding" problem. Instead it appears to show a way to make a particular type "movable". Have I misunderstood? (How) does your generalize to a way to write forwarding functions?

It doesn't. I get the issues confused because we were solving them with the same mechanism (rvalue references). This is about move semantics. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com