Akira Takahashi wrote:
IIUC, the output of `regular` does not satisfy the Regular concept. Is this just an implementation deficiency or intentional behavior? If it is intentional, then the name `regular` might not be a good name...
Now fixing missing feature of Regular concept.
Nice :) A few comments:
template <class F> RegularFunctorType regular(F f)
* What is the requirement of `F`? CopyConstructible? This should be documented, too. * If `F` has relational operators, do `RegularFunctorType`'s relational operators use them? If not, I think it would be better to document it. * `indirect_functor` does not support `boost::result_of` protocol for nullary function calls. See ticket #6914 for details https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6914 Regards, Michel