On 9/11/2011 3:43 PM, Joel Falcou wrote:
Le 11/09/2011 21:11, Eric Niebler a écrit :
Joel, can you give an example of where this might help>
I don't like how all transform are crammed in a single header
Many are in matches.hpp, and this could be broken up. Others are already defined in spearate headers under the transform/ directory.
or how the proto_fwd is hugely huge :/
I tend to doubt a few hundred forward declarations and typedefs present much of a problem.
I wonder if having a forward folder contianing fine grain forward header wont be better.
I avoid fusion, sadly. Proto is not built on top of fusion for just this reason. Proto is expensive enough all by itself. :-P
I was thinking of when you use some fusion algorithm on expression. This is a purely Fusion problem
I think this only happens in proto::(reverse_)fold, and only when the sequence isn't a proto expression type. But perhaps I'm forgetting something.
There usually isn't, AFAIK.
Herp I thought it will :(
Herp? I suspect something is really very wrong for the compile times John is seeing. But at this point, it's impossible to say. John, you might also try Steven's template profiler. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com