11 Jan
2006
11 Jan
'06
2:01 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Edward Diener <eddielee@tropicsoft.com> writes:
So while I have always been a supporter of Borland in the past I do not see that they are serious about fixing their compiler bugs, or even consider it important to do so.
Maybe we should move on, then. At this point they may need us more than we need them.
Discussions of "us" (Boost) and "them" (Borland) is leaving someone out: the developers who need both us /and/ them to play nice. That said, I haven't seen any Borland regression results in a loooong time. Borland support is pretty much a non-starter unless we can get regular test results. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com