Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
On 5/17/11 5:40 AM, lcaminiti wrote:
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
I would be happy to volunteer to be the review manager if one is
needed
to move the process along, but since I am new to the community and personally biased in favor of the library (though I would endeavor to be unbiased as a reviewer) I recognize you all will presumably want someone that you all know better and who is more neutral. Regardless, I hope
Greg once mentioned that he would be willing to be the Review Manager but I am not sure if that is still a valid offer:)
My offer still stands, with the same caveats I mentioned before. :-)
Greg, on my part, I gladly accept your offer to be the Review Manager for Boost.Local. Thank you! From: 1) The guidelines at http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Review_Manager "Before a library can be scheduled for formal review, an active boost member not connected with the library submission must volunteer to be the "Review Manager" for the library." 2) The brief discussions at http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/introductions-tt3529868.html 3) The fact that no Booster raised concerns I don't think that the caveats you mentioned should be of concern. http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Wizard Ron (as the Review Wizard), would you consider Greg's offer to the Boost.Local's Review Manager acceptable? If yes, is it possible to assign a date to the Boost.Local review? Thanks, --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Review-request-tp3522996p3536110.ht... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.