25 Jun
2007
25 Jun
'07
4:19 p.m.
"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote in message news:002301c7b741$0798cc40$0200a8c0@hetp7...
I think the weight of opinion is firmly behind keeping Quickbook as a favoured, but not exclusive, Boost docs tool.
Let me clarify again my point: Boost should require BoostBook as a documentation format. This is the format documentation should be kept in source control and delivered with release Boost shouldn't require what tools are used to generate BoostBook documents. Whether it's QuickBook, XML editor, any other facility is irrelevant and libraries authors are free to use any of them (and keep some intermediate files under source control if necessary) Gennadiy