larsbj@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
| Such claims are barred by the doctrine of copyright misuse and | the doctrine of first sale.
So what you are saying is that GPL/LGPL is unenforceable? So that all software that uses GPL has in fact no-license at all and that regular copyright law rules?
Are you then saying that no-one is really allowed to use GPL software since they have not got permission to do so?
You really seem to have some agenda, but it is not clear to me what it is.
Maybe this is all a distraction. I think it may be a much bigger problem that the graph library's license, IIUC, seems to be incompatible with the Boost license requirements. Isn't anyone a little alarmed about that? I guess if there's a chance we can relicense it under the Boost license, that'd solve things, but I'm not sure it's possible. Can any of the copyright holders comment? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com