Daryle Walker wrote:
Is this for the 1.34 branch or the HEAD, or both? (Vladimir copied the HEAD version to 1.34.)
1.34 branch.
Looking at the diff, I noticed that you conditionally replace the custom types with (unsigned) long. The point of those types is to use non-built-in types with or without numeric limits. If they can't be supported, then those tests should be skipped completely, not substituted with (unsigned) long.
I know: however I had problems with the pp-logic, without that extra dummy type the mpl list terminated with a "," which wasn't legal code. OK let me try again, how about changing that section to: typedef ::boost::mpl::list< #ifdef BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG long long, #elif defined(BOOST_HAS_MS_INT64) __int64, #endif signed char, short, int, long #ifndef BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS , MyInt1 #endif
signed_test_types;
typedef ::boost::mpl::list< #ifdef BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG unsigned long long, #elif defined(BOOST_HAS_MS_INT64) unsigned __int64, #endif unsigned char, unsigned short, unsigned, unsigned long #ifndef BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS , MyUnsigned1, MyUnsigned2 #endif
unsigned_test_types;
Which puts things in a slightly unnatural order, but does what you want now I think? John.