-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Robert Ramey Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 3:46 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [random] seeding with arbitrary integers
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
-----Original Message-----
So I repeat my view that we need a two stage acceptance process.
First that the library is fundamentally acceptable, and second that cosmetic aspects and documentation are good enough.
I don't see this a real change. A tiny incremental change in the review process can address this.
a) review b) acceptance This almost always conditional on some more work being done. At this point the author can check into the trunk etc. c) library is merged into release branch ONLY when the original review manager certifies that it's done.
Sounds better to me. And improvements to the documentation toolchain (& its documentation!) are probably even more important. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow@hetp.u-net.com