So, with limited resources (time, labour, and technical expertise on complier), would it be safe to assume that i should pursue other routes (e.g. boost with gcc or with stlport) and not continue with the beast (compling boost with libCstd?). Your professional opinion is much appreciated.
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:10:23 +0000 From: Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost 1.41: list_of] Boost compliation error, Sun Studio 11 using standard C++ lib Message-ID: <4B4018AF.2020705@loskot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
shing fan wrote:
I'm having trouble building Boost headers (e.g. <boost/assign/list_of.hpp> ) with Sun Studio 11 using standard C++ library. I have no problem when i build the headers using the stlport lib. However, due to some restrictions, i have to use the standard c++ lib but not the stlport lib. Does anyone know whether it is possible to complie the following headers using sun studio 11 with ONLY the standard C++ library? I'm okay to use even 1.38 as long as i can compile it with Sun Studio 11 using ONLY the C++ standard library.
The default standard library for Sun is not supported because it is insufficiently standards compliant.
I would quote Roman Shaposhnik's workshop [1] from Sun:
"BOOST with libCstd.so.1 : Can Happen, but is insane"
[1] http://www.osdevcon.org/2008/files/tutorial-roman/
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
_________________________________________________________________ Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691815