Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?

Gennadiy Rozenal <rogeeff@gmail.com> writes:

Alexander Lamaison <awl03 <at> doc.ic.ac.uk> writes:

...

Or just BOOST_TEST as that is now the default testing tool? TEST_CHECK an TEST_ASSERTION etc. are redundant as it says the same thing twice.

I need 3 names: warn, check and require levels. What do you propose?

I'd call the check version BOOST_TEST and the require version BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE as it's not the tool you immediately reach for. I must admit, I've no idea what the warning variant does. How does that differ from CHECK? I can't find it documented here [1]. [1] http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_51_0/libs/test/doc/html/utf/testing-tools/re... Alex