Re: [boost] boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?

So it looks like a change in math got pushed to develop that fixed this up, thank you. Are we pushing it to master for 1.73? On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:16 PM degski via Boost wrote:

clang-10 just got released, so soon, was really soon.

degski

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 13:00, Peter Dimov via Boost

...

wrote:

...

degski wrote:

...

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 12:18, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

...

Mike wrote:

...

As degski mentioned, I doubt clang 3.4 was a particularly popular compiler to begin with, so the answer is probably no.

Clang 3.4 was the default Clang on Ubuntu Trusty.

And then there was Xenial and there after Bionic, and judging from the past release dates soon a new LTS release. In the meanwhile IBM acquired RedHat (and Fedora and CentOS) ...

Sure, I'm not saying it's relevant. But if you consider g++ 4.8 popular because it was default on Trusty, you can't consider Clang 3.4 not-popular because it was, too.

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- @systemdeg "We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski "Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist" - Kenneth E. Boulding "Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward P. Abbey

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost