Re: [boost] [functional] adding overload

During Boost.Local review, it was proposed to move the overload template out of Local and in Boost.Functional. What would the best name for it?

1) boost::overload_function (my preference) 2) boost::overloaded_function 3) boost::function_overload 4) boost::functional::overload (Boost.Functional seems to use boost:: directly and not boost::functional-- to mimic C++11 ).

I like boost::functional::overload. You can then add a convenience function make_overload() with creates one without having to specify the template parameters, and it will be at once intuitive-sounding and consistent with Boost naming conventions. Regards, Nate