6 Aug
2011
6 Aug
'11
8:29 p.m.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
I'll put something together and make sure it all gets to Release.
Opinions on the following macro implementation? http://codepaste.net/svq4hu I could make an _T version for C++0x compilers that support the required 0x features other than the relaxed typename rule, but I'm not sure if that's necessary or if such compilers exist (right now I just always use typename to eliminate the need for more macros). I'll also do some basic error reporting if the macro is invoked when it is not supported. -- -Matt Calabrese