12 Apr
2017
12 Apr
'17
9:07 p.m.
On 04/12/17 23:55, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:
I'm currently strongly considering placing Outcome and all my Boost like libraries under the EUPL licence. It far better matches the "Licence requirements" at http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html than the Boost licence does.
A license that is 7 A4 pages doesn't look like one that is "simple to read and understand". Also, from a cursory look, it doesn't seem to require to retain copyright notices and the license in redistributed source code. There may be other significant differences, which is difficult to learn quickly because of that license volume and language.