"David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:87vemwx0f5.fsf@pereiro.luannocracy.com...
"Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
"Doug Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> wrote
On Oct 6, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Andy Little wrote:
"Stefan Seefeld" <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
<...>
(and in fact I'm totally delighted to find the documentation use Concepts to present them !),
I wasnt going to bring it up, but I was specifically told not to use Concept docs.
?
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/144195
para 5
? I don't see anything there that amounts to "specifically telling you not to use Concept docs."
Concepts arent an established convention. Read Doug Gregors post. They havent been finalised. I knew exactly what you meant in that and other discussions. Also I can say with a large amount of certainty that if I had presented PQS for another review, and had used Concept documentation, then it would be pointed out by you or others that I had been specifically told not to do so. Now I shall sit back and watch the goalposts move as if by magic ... regards Andy Little