18 Aug
2009
18 Aug
'09
12:08 p.m.
Scott McMurray wrote:
2009/8/17 M M <mostafa_working_away@yahoo.com>:
1) Given this conflict, will you still proceed with the same function name? (As an fyi, all other boost libraries I've incorporated into the iphone fortunately don't have this problem.)
The name was chosen as that's what it's called in S4.1.7 of the UUID RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt
Do you have a suggestion for a new one?
1.0) Why not make a static class variable named NIL, since nil() returns the same value all the time? 2) (I know this is off topic and I admit that I haven't researched the mailinglists for this one) If it's still going to remain a function, shouldn't it be static?