Jeff Garland wrote:
I moved your thoughts to the main page of discussion -- somehow you wound up on a closely related, but not the same name page...
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Relational_Da...
I also noticed there is a "competing" page: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Relational_Da... Is it useful to have both?
6) Allows for the user of the library to "plug in" thier own binding \ subscription system. (to support bound controls) "
Can you clarify what you mean by 'bound controls'?
I second the requirement, but with different interpretation. I think it is good to have the possibility to difine bindings for user-defined datatypes. Specializing a given class template is one way to achieve this variation point and is consistent with how it is done in STL. -- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/