15 Sep
2005
15 Sep
'05
1:43 a.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel de Guzman" <joel@boost-consulting.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive [snip]
something useful and concise was there no flirtation with "key words" (i.e. in the manner of "as_xpr"). "+" could have been "one_or_more( xpr )".
Again, we've had this discussion before. You might want to look at the archives when Spirit was being reviewed. I'm glad Eric chose
Cool. Was searching after your last post. Also looking for explicit statements in the xpressive docs about conformance (e.g. with Spirit, Perl, ECMAScript,...). I remember reading them. But not what they said :-) All good.