Re: [boost] Subject: Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library starts tomorrow

Steven Watanabe-4 wrote:

AMDG

On 2/7/2011 11:09 AM, Vicente Botet wrote:

...

for the moment I have started with the documentation. Here there are some remarks and questions:

I would prefer to see in the Synopsis which functions are available on which specific platforms. Instead of

process(handle);

document

#if defined(BOOST_WINDOWS_API) process(handle); #endif

so it will be more clear what can be used.

This isn't possible with the Doxygen/BoostBook toolchain.

Hrrr. It's a shame :( Well I will then be happy with a table compiling the differences. Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Subject-Formal-Review-of-Proposed-Boost-P... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.