18 Nov
2007
18 Nov
'07
6:55 p.m.
Hi Corrado,
I solved differently, by writing an adapter around in_place_factory (that can be found attached).
Which is along the lines of what I was thinking. Having "out_of_place" inherit from "in_place" is still odd IMO, so I prefer having a common "typed_factory_base" holding the parameters list from which the two versions derive (these dervied class just define the apply()). Furthermore, this is off the top of my head, but I was thinking when I first responded you that the parameter list could be stored within an aggregated struct to make it easier to convert one kind of factory into another. Best Fernando