4 Aug
2007
4 Aug
'07
4:01 p.m.
Robert Ramey wrote:
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
This logical and technical separation between A and B is the kind of modularity I have in mind. Whether that actually leads to separate release cycles for A and B is an entirely different (and to the most degree non-technical) matter.
And I believe something similar is what Robert was alluding to when talking about "running development tests on our local system against the latest release". Correct ?
Correct.
Well, you didn't tell us how you do that. Building a library against an external boost tree (installed or not) isn't quite supported yet. Have you modified boost.build locally to fit this purpose ? Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...