Andy Little wrote:
"Joel de Guzman" <joel@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:ef9mui$nhb$1@sea.gmane.org...
Andy Little wrote:
OK. FWIW I found that creating a sequence by pushing_back result_types to an empty vector is a great way to 'create' a result sequence at compile time. It kind of creates something out of nothing. At runtime however I found I could employ a different approach by using recursive functors(that is still compile time rather than runtime recursion, but much faster to compile and using less resources, whereas joint_view can be a resource hog) A resource hog? At compile time? At runtime? I'd like to know how you arrived at that observation.
FWIW the whole story is available in Quan CVS In the same directory with the following files, (though much of it is tedious to wade through)
[snips]
But yeah. Don't take it too seriously. To analyse it properly would take a long time and I was having too much "fun with Fusion" at that time. :-)
I see. It seems you'll indeed have a perf-boost when we get the segmented stuff in! :) Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net