
25 Feb
2009
25 Feb
'09
9:28 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote:
vicente.botet skrev:
As unique exist already, what about unique_view. With the _view suffix we state clearly that the evaluation is lazy.
Just to make sure there is no confusion on this point, then the orignal _ed suffix was supposed to mean "lazy". That doesn't mean it is perfect naming scheme, of course.
No confusion, at least from my part. I think the -ed sufix does convey the lazyness of the algorithm. I'm just against it for purely aesthetic reasons. I could live with it (and in fact i prefer it to the _view variant, at least is shorter and easier to type). -- gpd