2011/3/18 Frédéric Bron <frederic.bron@m4x.org>:
I'd prefer is_plus_assignable if we go that route.
is_ or are_...
good point ;) I think is_ because (1) We can think of the triple <T,U,R> of types that plus_assign *is* applicable on. (2) Each of those operations assigned to an operator can be decomposed is_plus_assignable<T,U,R> U *is* combinable to T and then the result *is* assignable to R
Some time ago before this review, we had a long discussion about names and there was also the possibility to use namespace as replacement of common prefix. However I think this should be done for the entire type trait library,
hmm, I don't think this is an option. We would break existing code.
not only the extension so that it should be a next step if it is believed to be interesting.
once published as official boost library it's too late to change the naming. Joachim -- Interval Container Library [Boost.Icl] http://www.joachim-faulhaber.de