5 Nov
2006
5 Nov
'06
11:56 p.m.
Anthony Williams wrote:
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
Anthony Williams wrote:
Do failures like this one not warrant a mention? (bind on vc 7.1)
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/ou...
This failure is caused by VC's linker folding duplicate identical functions into one (which is why the test only fails in release mode). I don't know what can be done about it. It's probably not a problem in practice.
Maybe it should be marked up as "expected failure" or something, then.
It's not an expected failure if the optimization is not enabled.