Re: [boost] toward a more modular boost

Jeff Garland wrote:

I think better installers is certainly an important part of this puzzle. Still, I suspect there will be folks that are intimidated anyway. There's lots of reasons for this attitude -- most of which I think we cannot solve...

I'd like to see boost build a single dll/lib rather than multiples if that is what people like - possibly with the option to specify which libs go in it. We currently use thread date_time filesystem regex serialization And in some places test also. I'd rather just one DLL was generated, or at least the option to link to just boost-1.32 rather than 5 or more individual libs. Cheers Russell