On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Steven Ross via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org
wrote:
I would prefer a mini-review myself (as I agreed to do when adding new algorithms to the collection).but Ronald suggested I do a full review. My main questions are: Does anyone care about Timsort? Will Alexander maintain the source and answer questions about it?
If you don't care about Timsort, you don't need to review it.
I don't know if I care about TimSort (though I'd really *like* to know that). That's exactly the sort of question documentation is meant to answer. It needs to be ready before the review, so that reviewers can even do the review. It also needs to exist so that after the review, users can determine if the code will be useful to them, without having to create or run benchmarks, or read source code. Zach