10 Aug
2004
10 Aug
'04
2:24 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Right now I have given this fix a low priority since I'm focusing on the documentation and more important tests. I made the test in the first place to see which compilers that did not choke on it; it might have been a sligh abuse of our test setup, but it is the only way to gain access to a lot of compilers.
So please don't worry too much about this test.
I don't see yet what to fix here: compat2 differs from compat1 _only_ in the missing 'typename'. [This was also the reason for me to remove this test during you absence.] What actually does the information about how compilers treat a missing 'typename' tell you? Stefan