Re: [boost] Proposal for library addition: faster signals/slots, reactor, atomics

Jeffrey Bosboom wrote:

Helge Bahmann wrote:

...

Hello everyone

I have written a small library providing:

- a (thread-safe) signal/slot implementation - poll/timer/reactor implementation - atomic operations modelled after the proposed C++0x standard (x86 32/64 bit, ppc, alpha, more if someone donates hardware; fallback implementation using locks)

I'm not really interested in the signals/slots implementation or the reactor, but I'm very interested in an implementation of the C++0x standard atomics. I encourage you to split the atomics from the other parts of the library, since they will be useful in many more contexts (including other Boost libraries).

+1, absolutely.