Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions

On 24.06.2012, at 01:33, Robert Ramey wrote:

But this facility is included in the same library as another facility useful to users. So addressing of one problem - non-conforming compilers is not orthogonal to the other problem - helpful facilities for users. It's not fine grained enough for my taste.

They're not non-conforming. They're just not C++11-enabled. There's a big difference. Sebastian